For the record I am not a fervent Ron Paul supporter.
That said there is much of Dr. Paul's agenda that I agree with . His fiscal policies would go a long way to addressing many of this Countries problems. I am also not a fervent Mitt Romney supporter. Being a conservative there is much to be desired in the record of Mitt Romney and the voting record of Paul Ryan. This is not about who I support in this election but rather it is about the process of selecting our presidential candidate.
The controversy here is this. My vote at the caucus does not count. The only vote that was important was the election of delegates. I was under the assumption that they were bound and now as it would seem each delegate is free to vote for whomever they wish. So the nominee will be picked by the election of the delegates who were voted to represent us at the State convention. Does this not discount the vote of all of the Republicans who attended the caucus and did not support Dr. Paul. This controversy was started with the recent discovery of Rule 38 and it ramifications on the Republican candidate for president. Rule 38 states:
RULE NO. 38
Unit Rule
No delegate or alternate delegate shall be
bound by any attempt of any state or Congressional
district to impose the unit rule.
Republican Party Rule Book:
www.gop.com/images/legal/2008_RULES_Adopted.pdf
Due to a challenge by a member of the Utah delegation in 2008 the RNC legal counsel offered this opinion
“Jennifer Sheehan, Legal Counsel for the RNC, plainly stated in a letter to Nancy Lord, Utah National Committeewoman, several weeks before the convention, 'The RNC does not recognize a state's binding of national delegates, but considers each delegate a free agent who can vote for whoever they choose.'”
This would seem to me to suggest the Presidential Candidates in the future will be chosen by a small minority of active Republicans that will pledge to attend the caucus, county convention , State Convention, and elect delegates who pledge to attend the National convention and commit to a particular candidate. This system would discourage participation in the caucus process which is already very low and concentrate power among a small number of people.
There have been many members of the Nevada Republican Party (myself included) who have spent countless hours working in party politics. In a meeting of the State Central Committee in 2010 we voted on the delegate process for the 2012 elections. After many hours of discussion the committee voted to have a process by which the delegates would be proportioned and committed to the various candidates according to the 2012 caucus straw poll. There was no knowledge or mention of rule 38 which would in effect render our decisions a moot point.
Now in light of this obscure rule we are on the verge of discounting the vote of every caucus attendee.What are we to tell the Republicans who gave up their Saturday morning to attend the caucus to cast their vote for the candidate of their choice? Your vote does not count because we have changed the rules. No one knows how this controversy will play out. One thing is for sure we as a party are now making a statement.
Republicans - your vote no longer counts.
Frank Ricotta
Political Director Clark County Republican Party
Former Chairman Clark County Republican Party
Member Clark County Central Committee
Member Nevada State Republican Party Central Committee
Saturday, August 18, 2012
Friday, June 8, 2012
Clark County Republican Party Past, Present, and Future
Clark County
Republican Party
Past, Present, and Future
The Clark County Republican Party according to its by-laws
will support all Republican Candidates for office elected in the June 12, 2012
primaries.
The CCRP will work with the Nevada State Republican Party
and all other groups in Nevada that are interested in electing Republicans to
office in Nevada at all levels of government.
Perhaps it is time to reflect on the past and see how far we
have come in the last 4 years. When I first joined the CCRP it was a small
organization of less than 200 members. The headquarters were located in a
dismal office on Decatur. The state Republican Party was located in the back of
the county party office on a card table surrounded by a stack of cardboard
boxes. Both organizations were effectively broke and broken. The office area
looked like the backroom of the Salvation Army collection point.
The new members in 2009 arrived with good intentions and an
eagerness to get to work to help the Republican Party be successful in Nevada.
We were met with skepticism and scorn and certainly felt anything but
welcome. We were not deterred and in the
3 years since being involved from Coalitions to Chairman I have watched the
party grow and become a more professional organization at all levels. We had
many goals most of which were not realized but as a Tea Partier I have always
been proud of what we did accomplish during this time.
Facts do not lie. The net result of the State Republican
Party and the County Republican Party existing under the current rules of our
parties has not been good. Republicans are the minority in both the State
Senate and State Assembly. Leadership on a party level is virtually nonexistent
from our senior elected officials. Party unity has never been more fractured as
a general environment of misunderstanding and emotion has clouded good
conversation and logic. Obviously something has to change as repeating our
current behavior cannot change our expected result.
Looking to the future there now exists an unprecedented
opportunity for change. The CCRP membership is strong and robust as we go
through this short transitional period of reorganization. The future goals of
the party are well defined and achievable. What are these goals?
The ability to recruit, support, and endorse candidates in
Republican Primary Races.
The ability to participate in all local government races.
The ability to bring the goal of smaller more efficient
government to all levels of government in Clark County.
The ability to work with our leadership of elected officials
in order to strengthen our party and put forward a strong conservative platform
in Nevada.
The ability to hold our Republican elected officials feet to
the fire once elected. Encourage our candidates to uphold their pledge to
uphold the constitution. Insist on having our elected officials be accountable to
their constituents.
These
were the goals of the Tea Party when it first burst on to the political scene
in 2009. Now a new wave of Liberty minded constitutional supporters have
emerged as new party leadership at both the state and County levels. The
reaction has been much the same as 4 years ago. Misunderstanding, mistrust and
a lack of civil debate. I would encourage all Nevada Republicans who want to
see politics in Nevada change to take a moment to reflect on your core beliefs
and honestly compare them to the goals of the new leadership at both the State
and County levels.
Do
not disengage. Engage. Do not resign.. Join. Do not let emotion rule. Engage in
civil debate
.
There
is a great opportunity ahead of us if you have the courage to stand up and
unite.
Frank
Ricotta
Clark County Republican Party Political
Director
The strength and resilience of a grassroots
movement is the ability of citizens at the local level to determine their own
platforms, agendas and priorities free of an overriding central leadership.
Exercising the clearly stated message of the Liberty movement by its nature
involves discourse about which policies and candidates best hold to our stated
principles, and these various opinions should flourish and evolve at the local
level.
“Here sir, the people govern.” --Alexander Hamilton in a speech to the New York Ratifying
Convention, 1788
“Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people
alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories.” --Samuel Adams, 1781
“This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who
inhabit it.” --Abraham Lincoln
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Taxpayer Protection Pledge- The guarantee on the box ?
Taxpayer Protection Pledge- The guarantee on the box ?
What is a guarantee? Or better yet, why do people like it "on the box?" Simple, because it makes a man feel good. As Chris Farley was quoted movie Tommy Boy (1995):
Mr. Conservative Voter: Let's think about this for a sec, John Q, why do they put a guarantee on a box? Hmm, very interesting.
John Q: I'm listening.
Mr. Conservative: Here's how I see it. A guy puts a guarantee on the box 'cause he wants you to feel all warm and toasty inside.
John Q: Yeah, makes a man feel good.
Mr. Conservative: 'Course it does. Ya think if you leave that box under your pillow at night, the Guarantee Fairy might come by and leave a quarter and not grow Government and raise taxes
John Q: What's your point?
Mr. Conservative: The point is, how do you know the Guarantee Fairy isn't a tax and spender? "Building a strong efficient government" says the little fairy, but we're not buying it. Next thing you know, there's money missing out of your paycheck and your state budget has grown again, I seen it a hundred times.
John Q: But why do they put a guarantee on the box then?
Mr. Conservative: Because they know all they sold ya was a guaranteed piece of crap. That's all it is. Hey, if you want me to take some of that and put in a box and mark it guaranteed, I will. I got spare time. But for right now, for your sake, for your families sake, ya might wanna think about voting for a quality candidate who will keep their campaign promises.
John Q: Hmm. Okay, I'll vote for the principled conservatives
Mr. Conservative: Well that’s great now go and do your own due diligence and make an educated choice
Don't I wish it was that easy? Mr. Conservative makes an excellent point. He would argue that the guarantee on a box is meaningless. The candidates will promise you the world to get your vote. You give the time, the energy, and in many cases your hard earned money. Have you received a satisfactory return on your investment? We must demand more from our elected officials.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Calling all Nevada Tea Party Activists
After the 2008 elections a groundswell of Tea Party Patriots became active in local politics for the first time. With the election of a very liberal president and the progressive left agenda being pushed on the American people, it was time for we the people to speak.
Nevada was at the forefront on this resurgence with multiple tea party groups emerging across the state and especially in Clark County. Realizing the realities of the 2 party system many elected to join their local county Republican party to initiate change and bring their strong Conservative views to the party. Much was accomplished in the last 3 years and the new energized members can be proud of their accomplishments.
There is much work left to be done and 2012 is probably one of the most important elections of our lifetime. Now is the time to recommit yourself to the goal of helping conservatives win in this year's election.
If you attended this year’s caucus and elected to become a delegate to the Clark County Convention there are many ways to get involved. Consider running for the e-board, elect to become a state delegate, volunteer as many hours as you can to work either the republican party or with a candidate of your choice
I have served in many capacities in the county party, coalitions director, vice chairman , and had the honor of being elected as the Chairman in 2010. Unfortunately I had to resign for health reasons in 2011. I am now ready to serve again and hope you will join me.
I am running for the position of political director for the Clark County Republican Party. I would ask that you join me in bringing the conservative message to the party. I humbly ask for your support and your vote.
Together we can and will enjoy victory in this year’s elections. Failure is not an option!
In liberty,
Frank Ricotta
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)